This question was asked after my last post and my pic. of wool fabric, an op-shop find. So, how did I know?
It felt "woolly". Vague description, I know, but after years of fondling the stuff it becomes familiar. Acrylic/synthetic, or a high wool-to-synthetic ratio feels "squeaky". I am very technical in my descriptions.
If the fabric is really lovely or potentially useful and I'm confounded by the fibre content I bring it home and subject it to the burn test: snip off a small amount of fabric and hold it to a candle flame with long tweezers. Wool smoulders and doesn't burst into flame readily. It also smells of burning hair. Synthetic fabrics melt when burnt. I have a chart from Threads magazine, Feb/Mar 1999, that lists the types of fibre (or fiber, since it's a US mag) what happens approaching the flame, in the flame, removed from flame, odour, type of ash.
However, if it feels like wool that's good enough for me.
Change of subject entirely.
I've really enjoyed this book recently.
An amazing house, highly decorated by two of those living there: Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant.
These two were part of what is known as the "Bloomsbury Group" something that's fascinated me for years. Their appearance of arty bohemia perhaps? Unlike my own life? They had their petty squabbles, their rivalries and griefs though.
I would wonder how Vanessa Bell had time to paint, then I read that there was a cook and housekeeper, as well as a gardener. And often someone to tutor the children. I'm glad of that, for her, otherwise she may never have painted.
Now I've started on The Art of Bloomsbury by Richard Shone, which is about the painting of Roger Fry, Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant. Lots of colour plates - mmmm, lovely.
Change subject again.
Appearing in my stats is a lot of images.google.com/imgres. When I click on them a photo from one or other of my blog posts comes up. Can anyone tell me what this means? Am I being paranoid in thinking my photos are being "lifted"? Would appreciate any feedback you can give people.